Platelet-Rich Fibrin Versus Connective Tissue Graft Using Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA) Technique in Multiple Gingival Recessions: Randomized Controlled Trial

Main Article Content

Yasmin Sery
Marwa Hegab
Khaled Keraa
Ahmed El Barbary
Mona Darhous

Abstract

Background: One of the most common esthetic concerns in dentistry is gingival recession (GR), and despite the various treatment strategies for root coverage, multiple recessions still present a great challenge, especially Miller Class III/RT2. Thus, this study aimed to compare the effect of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) versus connective tissue graft (CTG) using vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access (VISTA) in patients with Miller class III/RT2 multiple recessions for root coverage. Methods: Twenty-eight patients with multiple Class III/RT2 gingival recessions were randomly allocated to two equal groups – group 1 (VISTA+PRF) and group 2 (VISTA+CTG). Recession depth (RD) and width (RW), probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival thickness, keratinized tissue width, and root coverage esthetic score (RES) were measured at 0, 3, and 6 months. Statistical analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Bonferroni’s post-hoc test was used for pair-wise comparisons when ANOVA was significant. For non-parametric data, the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare between the two groups. Results: Within each group, a significant difference from baseline to six months was found. However, between groups, the results for the VISTA+CTG group significantly surpassed the VISTA+PRF group in most clinical outcomes; gingival recession depth (0.5 [0.25-1.75] and 1.33 [0.75-2], respectively), and width (1 [0.38-3.75] and 2.33 [1.33-3], respectively), gingival thickness at three and six months (2.62±0.36 and 2.63±0.36, respectively) and (1.85±0.2 and 1.87±0.18, respectively), and keratinized tissue width (3.98±0.72 and 3.33±0.56, respectively). However, CAL and PD showed a statistically insignificant difference when comparing both groups. Conclusion: The use of CTG is superior to PRF in root coverage of Miller Class III/RT2 when the VISTA technique is used. Connective tissue grafts can be considered the gold standard for root coverage.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sery, Y., Hegab, M., Keraa, K., El Barbary, A., & Darhous, M. (2022). Platelet-Rich Fibrin Versus Connective Tissue Graft Using Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA) Technique in Multiple Gingival Recessions: Randomized Controlled Trial. Perio J, 6(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.26810/perioj.2022.a2
Section
Original Articles